Amir, Am 02.05.2017 um 09:19 schrieb Amir Goldstein: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger: >>>> So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :) >>> >>> I'll not do it for you. ;) >> >> Please also see http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149327990608749&w=2 >> > > Richard, > > Considering the facts that: > 1. I proposed the said flag and Al didn't think it was needed [1] > 2. ext4 already sets s_uuid without any flag for a long time now > 3. A similar patch was queued for v4.12 to set s_uuid for xfs without any flag > > I think it would be right to take Oleksij's patch as is. > > FYI, my current work on 'constant inode numbers for overlayfs' requires that > underlying filesystem had set a non-zero s_uuid. Not sure if that matters for > ubifs+overlayfs users. If VFS maintainers are fine with that, I'll take it. >From UBIFS' POV it does not matter much. :-) Thanks //richard
