On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 09:38:22PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >> It sounds more like AT_NO_ESCAPE ... or AT_BELOW, or something. > > I considered AT_ROACH_MOTEL at one point... Another interesting > question is whether EXDEV would've been better than ELOOP. > Opinions? In support of my homeland, I propose AT_HOTEL_CALIFORNIA. How about EXDEV for crossing a mountpoint and ELOOP for absolute symlinks or invalid ..? (Is there a technical reason why the same AT_ flag should trigger both cases?) --Andy
