"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx): >> >> It is pointless and confusing to allow a pid namespace hierarchy and >> the user namespace hierarchy to get out of sync. The owner of a child >> pid namespace should be the owner of the parent pid namespace or >> a descendant of the owner of the parent pid namespace. >> >> Otherwise it is possible to construct scenarios where it is legal to >> do something in a parent pid namespace but in a child pid namespace. > > Hi, > > did you mean 'but not in a child...' above? Actually I believe I meant: >> Otherwise it is possible to construct scenarios where it is not legal >> to do something in a parent pid namespace but it is legal a child pid >> namespace. I definitely need to fix that wording thank you. Eric
