Re: completely ignore unknown open flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:41:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > This is the fallout from the reject unknown flags discussion a few
> > weeks back.  So to keep backwards compatibily we can't _reject_ unknown
> > flags.  But we'd better totally ignore them and don't pass them to
> > file systems or back to userspace using fcntl.
> 
> Ack, this makes sense to me. It's crazy to let fcntl etc show bits
> that the kernel isn't even using.
> 
> I'm assuming this will come through Al eventually. It doesn't seem
> high-priority for me to worry about it just before the 4.11 release,
> but it might be worth marking for stable just to percolate the change
> eventually to other kernels, and keep these kinds of differences
> minimal.

Applied tonight, still hadn't pushed it out into -next - the tree goes through
testing.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux