Andrew Morton пишет: > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:49:19 +0300 > Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Zach Brown пишет: >>>>> This doesn't look fine. Did you test this? >>>> Oops, my fault. Of course, I tested the patch, but kernel modules are >>>> disabled in my test setup, so I missed the error. >>> :) >>> >>>> Enclosed to this message is a new patch, which replaces the goto-loop by >>>> the while-based one, but leaves the EXPORT_SYMBOL macro intact. >>> It certainly looks OK to me now, for whatever that's worth. >> Zach, thank you for the code review and suggestions. >> >>> You probably want to wait 'till the next merge window to get it in, >>> though. It's just a cleanup and so shouldn't go in this late in the -rc >>> line. >>> >>> Maybe Andrew will be willing to queue it until that time in -mm. >> I am enclosing the patch against current -mm tree and adding Andrew to the Cc: list. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dmitri >> >>> - z >>> >> > [loop-cleanup-fs-namespace-mm.diff text/x-patch (742B)] > Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c > index 79883fe..b098b63 100644 > --- a/fs/namespace.c > +++ b/fs/namespace.c > @@ -606,19 +606,17 @@ static inline void __mntput(struct vfsmo > > void mntput_no_expire(struct vfsmount *mnt) > { > -repeat: > - if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) { > + while (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) { > if (likely(!mnt->mnt_pinned)) { > spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock); > __mntput(mnt); > - return; > + break; > } > atomic_add(mnt->mnt_pinned + 1, &mnt->mnt_count); > mnt->mnt_pinned = 0; > spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock); > acct_auto_close_mnt(mnt); > security_sb_umount_close(mnt); > - goto repeat; > } > } > > This patch has no changelog which I can use. > > Andrew, thanks for the quick reply. I believe that a couple of sentences is enough for the changelog entry, so here it goes... From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@xxxxxxxxx> The mntput_no_expire() routine implements a simple loop using the goto-based construct. Replace this with an equivalent while-based loop, which looks much cleaner in C code.
Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@xxxxxxxxx> --- diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c index 79883fe..b098b63 100644 --- a/fs/namespace.c +++ b/fs/namespace.c @@ -606,19 +606,17 @@ static inline void __mntput(struct vfsmo void mntput_no_expire(struct vfsmount *mnt) { -repeat: - if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) { + while (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) { if (likely(!mnt->mnt_pinned)) { spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock); __mntput(mnt); - return; + break; } atomic_add(mnt->mnt_pinned + 1, &mnt->mnt_count); mnt->mnt_pinned = 0; spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock); acct_auto_close_mnt(mnt); security_sb_umount_close(mnt); - goto repeat; } }