Unchecked flags in statx(2) [Should be fixed before 4.11-final?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello David,

 I was reading your statx(2) man page, and noticed this text:

       Do not simply set mask to UINT_MAX as one or more bits may, in the
       future, be used to specify an extension to the buffer.

(Here' 'mask' is the fourth argument to statx())

What is going on here? Why is there  not a check in the code to
give EINVAL if any flag other than those in STATX_ALL (0x00000fffU)
is specified? (There is a check that gives EINVAL flags in 
STATX__RESERVED (0x80000000U), but STATX_ALL != ~STATX__RESERVED.

Similarly, there appears to be no check for invalid flags in the
'flags' argument of statx(). Why is there also not such a check
there?

The failure to do these sorts of checks has been the source of grief 
in the past with other system calls.

Cheers,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux