Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfstests: Add first statx test [ver #10]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Perhaps we should add a new autoconf rule in configure.ac and define
> HAVE_STATX if there's statx support, like what src/renameat2.c does?

The problem with that is that statx doesn't yet exist in glibc, so the tests
are going to be skipped.  I can define __NR_statx only on arches for which we
have a number and make xfstests_statx() give ENOSYS if __NR_statx isn't
defined.

David



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux