Re: [PATCH 20/33] fsnotify: Detach mark from object list when last reference is dropped

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:13:19PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Instead of removing mark from object list from fsnotify_detach_mark(),
> remove the mark when last reference to the mark is dropped. This will
> allow fanotify to wait for userspace response to event without having to
> hold onto fsnotify_mark_srcu.
> 
> To avoid pinning inodes by elevated refcount (and thus e.g. delaying
> file deletion) while someone holds mark reference, we detach connector
> from the object also from fsnotify_destroy_marks() and not only after
> removing last mark from the list as it was now.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/notify/mark.c                 | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h |   4 +-
>  kernel/audit_tree.c              |  24 ++---
>  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/notify/mark.c b/fs/notify/mark.c
> index 2bd9cdb094e1..7eef1824a76c 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/mark.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/mark.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,13 @@
>   *
>   * A list of notification marks relating to inode / mnt is contained in
>   * fsnotify_mark_connector. That structure is alive as long as there are any
> - * marks in the list and is also protected by fsnotify_mark_srcu.
> + * marks in the list and is also protected by fsnotify_mark_srcu. A mark gets
> + * detached from fsnotify_mark_connector when last reference to the mark is
> + * dropped.  Thus having mark reference is enough to protect mark->connector
> + * pointer and to make sure fsnotify_mark_connector cannot disappear. Also
> + * because we remove mark from g_list before dropping mark reference associated
> + * with that, any mark found through g_list is guaranteed to have
> + * mark->connector set until we drop group->mark_mutex.
>   *
>   * LIFETIME:
>   * Inode marks survive between when they are added to an inode and when their
> @@ -103,26 +109,16 @@ void fsnotify_get_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  	atomic_inc(&mark->refcnt);
>  }
>  
> -void fsnotify_put_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
> -{
> -	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mark->refcnt)) {
> -		spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
> -		list_add(&mark->g_list, &destroy_list);
> -		spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
> -		queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &reaper_work,
> -				   FSNOTIFY_REAPER_DELAY);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static void __fsnotify_recalc_mask(struct fsnotify_mark_connector *conn)
>  {
>  	u32 new_mask = 0;
>  	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  
>  	assert_spin_locked(&conn->lock);
> -	hlist_for_each_entry(mark, &conn->list, obj_list)
> -		new_mask |= mark->mask;
> -
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(mark, &conn->list, obj_list) {
> +		if (mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)
> +			new_mask |= mark->mask;
> +	}
>  	if (conn->flags & FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE)
>  		conn->inode->i_fsnotify_mask = new_mask;
>  	else if (conn->flags & FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_VFSMOUNT)
> @@ -131,8 +127,9 @@ static void __fsnotify_recalc_mask(struct fsnotify_mark_connector *conn)
>  
>  /*
>   * Calculate mask of events for a list of marks. The caller must make sure
> - * connector cannot disappear under us (usually by holding a mark->lock or
> - * mark->group->mark_mutex for a mark on this list).
> + * connector and connector->inode cannot disappear under us.  Callers achieve
> + * this by holding a mark->lock or mark->group->mark_mutex for a mark on this
> + * list.
>   */
>  void fsnotify_recalc_mask(struct fsnotify_mark_connector *conn)
>  {
> @@ -164,30 +161,59 @@ static void fsnotify_connector_destroy_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static struct inode *fsnotify_detach_from_object(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
> +static struct inode *fsnotify_detach_connector_from_object(
> +					struct fsnotify_mark_connector *conn)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode = NULL;
> +
> +	if (conn->flags & FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE) {
> +		inode = conn->inode;
> +		rcu_assign_pointer(inode->i_fsnotify_marks, NULL);
> +		inode->i_fsnotify_mask = 0;
> +		conn->inode = NULL;
> +		conn->flags &= ~FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE;
> +	} else if (conn->flags & FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_VFSMOUNT) {
> +		rcu_assign_pointer(real_mount(conn->mnt)->mnt_fsnotify_marks,
> +				   NULL);
> +		real_mount(conn->mnt)->mnt_fsnotify_mask = 0;
> +		conn->mnt = NULL;
> +		conn->flags &= ~FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_VFSMOUNT;
> +	}
> +
> +	return inode;
> +}

Could this helper been added in the previous patch where the code was
introduced?

> +
> +static void fsnotify_final_mark_destroy(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
> +{
> +	if (mark->group)
> +		fsnotify_put_group(mark->group);
> +	mark->free_mark(mark);
> +}
> +
> +void fsnotify_put_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  {
>  	struct fsnotify_mark_connector *conn;
>  	struct inode *inode = NULL;
>  	bool free_conn = false;
>  
> +	/* Catch marks that were actually never attached to object */
> +	if (!mark->connector) {
> +		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mark->refcnt))
> +			fsnotify_final_mark_destroy(mark);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We have to be careful so that traversals of obj_list under lock can
> +	 * safely grab mark reference.
> +	 */
> +	if (!atomic_dec_and_lock(&mark->refcnt, &mark->connector->lock))
> +		return;
> +
>  	conn = mark->connector;
> -	spin_lock(&conn->lock);
>  	hlist_del_init_rcu(&mark->obj_list);
>  	if (hlist_empty(&conn->list)) {
> -		if (conn->flags & FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE) {
> -			inode = conn->inode;
> -			rcu_assign_pointer(inode->i_fsnotify_marks, NULL);
> -			inode->i_fsnotify_mask = 0;
> -			conn->inode = NULL;
> -			conn->flags &= ~FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE;
> -		} else if (conn->flags & FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_VFSMOUNT) {
> -			rcu_assign_pointer(
> -				real_mount(conn->mnt)->mnt_fsnotify_marks,
> -				NULL);
> -			real_mount(conn->mnt)->mnt_fsnotify_mask = 0;
> -			conn->mnt = NULL;
> -			conn->flags &= ~FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_VFSMOUNT;
> -		}
> +		inode = fsnotify_detach_connector_from_object(conn);
>  		free_conn = true;
>  	} else {
>  		__fsnotify_recalc_mask(conn);
> @@ -195,6 +221,9 @@ static struct inode *fsnotify_detach_from_object(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  	mark->connector = NULL;
>  	spin_unlock(&conn->lock);
>  
> +	if (inode)
> +		iput(inode);
> +

iput() checks for non-NULL inode.


>  	if (free_conn) {
>  		spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
>  		conn->destroy_next = connector_destroy_list;
> @@ -202,20 +231,31 @@ static struct inode *fsnotify_detach_from_object(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  		spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
>  		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &connector_reaper_work);
>  	}
> -
> -	return inode;
> +	/*
> +	 * Note that we didn't update flags telling whether inode cares about
> +	 * what's happening with children. We update these flags from
> +	 * __fsnotify_parent() lazily when next event happens on one of our
> +	 * children.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
> +	list_add(&mark->g_list, &destroy_list);
> +	spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
> +	queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &reaper_work,
> +			   FSNOTIFY_REAPER_DELAY);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Remove mark from inode / vfsmount list, group list, drop inode reference
> - * if we got one.
> + * Mark mark as detached, remove it from group list. Mark still stays in object
> + * list until its last reference is dropped. Note that we rely on mark being
> + * removed from group list before corresponding reference to it is dropped. In
> + * particular we rely on mark->connector being valid while we hold
> + * group->mark_mutex if we found the mark through g_list.
>   *
>   * Must be called with group->mark_mutex held. The caller must either hold
>   * reference to the mark or be protected by fsnotify_mark_srcu.
>   */
>  void fsnotify_detach_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  {
> -	struct inode *inode = NULL;
>  	struct fsnotify_group *group = mark->group;
>  
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&group->mark_mutex));
> @@ -224,31 +264,15 @@ void fsnotify_detach_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  			!!(mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED));
>  
>  	spin_lock(&mark->lock);
> -
>  	/* something else already called this function on this mark */
>  	if (!(mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)) {
>  		spin_unlock(&mark->lock);
>  		return;
>  	}
> -
>  	mark->flags &= ~FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED;
> -
> -	inode = fsnotify_detach_from_object(mark);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Note that we didn't update flags telling whether inode cares about
> -	 * what's happening with children. We update these flags from
> -	 * __fsnotify_parent() lazily when next event happens on one of our
> -	 * children.
> -	 */
> -
>  	list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
> -
>  	spin_unlock(&mark->lock);
>  
> -	if (inode)
> -		iput(inode);
> -
>  	atomic_dec(&group->num_marks);
>  
>  	/* Drop mark reference acquired in fsnotify_add_mark_locked() */
> @@ -448,7 +472,9 @@ static int fsnotify_add_mark_list(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
>  	hlist_for_each_entry(lmark, &conn->list, obj_list) {
>  		last = lmark;
>  
> -		if ((lmark->group == mark->group) && !allow_dups) {
> +		if ((lmark->group == mark->group) &&
> +		    (lmark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED) &&
> +		    !allow_dups) {
>  			err = -EEXIST;
>  			goto out_err;
>  		}
> @@ -499,7 +525,7 @@ int fsnotify_add_mark_locked(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
>  	mark->group = group;
>  	list_add(&mark->g_list, &group->marks_list);
>  	atomic_inc(&group->num_marks);
> -	fsnotify_get_mark(mark); /* for i_list and g_list */
> +	fsnotify_get_mark(mark); /* for g_list */
>  	spin_unlock(&mark->lock);
>  
>  	ret = fsnotify_add_mark_list(mark, inode, mnt, allow_dups);
> @@ -547,7 +573,8 @@ struct fsnotify_mark *fsnotify_find_mark(
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	hlist_for_each_entry(mark, &conn->list, obj_list) {
> -		if (mark->group == group) {
> +		if (mark->group == group &&
> +		    (mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)) {
>  			fsnotify_get_mark(mark);
>  			spin_unlock(&conn->lock);
>  			return mark;
> @@ -627,23 +654,39 @@ void fsnotify_detach_group_marks(struct fsnotify_group *group)
>  void fsnotify_destroy_marks(struct fsnotify_mark_connector __rcu **connp)
>  {
>  	struct fsnotify_mark_connector *conn;
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark, *old_mark = NULL;
> +	struct inode *inode;
>  
> -	while ((conn = fsnotify_grab_connector(connp))) {
> -		/*
> -		 * We have to be careful since we can race with e.g.
> -		 * fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group() and once we drop the list
> -		 * lock, mark can get removed from the obj_list and destroyed.
> -		 * But we are holding mark reference so mark cannot be freed
> -		 * and calling fsnotify_destroy_mark() more than once is fine.
> -		 */
> -		mark = hlist_entry(conn->list.first, struct fsnotify_mark,
> -				   obj_list);
> +	conn = fsnotify_grab_connector(connp);
> +	if (!conn)
> +		return;
> +	/*
> +	 * We have to be careful since we can race with e.g.
> +	 * fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group() and once we drop the conn->lock, the
> +	 * list can get modified. However we are holding mark reference and
> +	 * thus our mark cannot be removed from obj_list so we can continue
> +	 * iteration after regaining conn->lock.
> +	 */
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(mark, &conn->list, obj_list) {
>  		fsnotify_get_mark(mark);
>  		spin_unlock(&conn->lock);
> +		if (old_mark)
> +			fsnotify_put_mark(old_mark);
> +		old_mark = mark;
>  		fsnotify_destroy_mark(mark, mark->group);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
> +		spin_lock(&conn->lock);
>  	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Detach list from object now so that we don't pin inode until all
> +	 * mark references get dropped. It would lead to strange results such
> +	 * as delaying inode deletion or blocking unmount.
> +	 */
> +	inode = fsnotify_detach_connector_from_object(conn);
> +	spin_unlock(&conn->lock);
> +	if (old_mark)
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(old_mark);
> +	if (inode)
> +		iput(inode);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -676,9 +719,7 @@ void fsnotify_mark_destroy_list(void)
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(mark, next, &private_destroy_list, g_list) {
>  		list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
> -		if (mark->group)
> -			fsnotify_put_group(mark->group);
> -		mark->free_mark(mark);
> +		fsnotify_final_mark_destroy(mark);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> index 84d71b6f75f6..a483614b25d0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> @@ -245,9 +245,9 @@ struct fsnotify_mark {
>  	struct list_head g_list;
>  	/* Protects inode / mnt pointers, flags, masks */
>  	spinlock_t lock;
> -	/* List of marks for inode / vfsmount [connector->lock] */
> +	/* List of marks for inode / vfsmount [connector->lock, mark ref] */
>  	struct hlist_node obj_list;
> -	/* Head of list of marks for an object [mark->lock, group->mark_mutex] */
> +	/* Head of list of marks for an object [mark ref] */
>  	struct fsnotify_mark_connector *connector;
>  	/* Events types to ignore [mark->lock, group->mark_mutex] */
>  	__u32 ignored_mask;
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index c0e494fd8eca..152400e8d077 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -172,27 +172,15 @@ static unsigned long inode_to_key(const struct inode *inode)
>  /*
>   * Function to return search key in our hash from chunk. Key 0 is special and
>   * should never be present in the hash.
> - *
> - * Must be called with chunk->mark.lock held to protect from connector
> - * becoming NULL.
>   */
> -static unsigned long __chunk_to_key(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
> +static unsigned long chunk_to_key(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  {
> -	if (!chunk->mark.connector)
> +	/* We have a reference to the mark so it should be attached. */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!chunk->mark.connector))
>  		return 0;

Hmm, lifetime of mark previously:

- created but not attached (connector is NULL, no FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)
- attached (connector is non-NULL, FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)
- detached (connector is NULL, no FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)

The created, and attached states remain the same but detached now changed to:

- detached (connector is non-NULL, no FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)

Considering that, the warning seems right but the comment above not so.
Maybe something like:

      /* We have a reference to the mark and it has been attached so we should
         have a valid connector. */


>  	return (unsigned long)chunk->mark.connector->inode;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long chunk_to_key(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
> -{
> -	unsigned long key;
> -
> -	spin_lock(&chunk->mark.lock);
> -	key = __chunk_to_key(chunk);
> -	spin_unlock(&chunk->mark.lock);
> -	return key;
> -}
> -
>  static inline struct list_head *chunk_hash(unsigned long key)
>  {
>  	unsigned long n = key / L1_CACHE_BYTES;
> @@ -202,7 +190,7 @@ static inline struct list_head *chunk_hash(unsigned long key)
>  /* hash_lock & entry->lock is held by caller */
>  static void insert_hash(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  {
> -	unsigned long key = __chunk_to_key(chunk);
> +	unsigned long key = chunk_to_key(chunk);
>  	struct list_head *list;
>  
>  	if (!key)
> @@ -263,7 +251,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
>  	spin_lock(&entry->lock);
> -	if (chunk->dead || !entry->connector) {
> +	if (chunk->dead || !entry->connector || !entry->connector->inode) {

So should we be testing FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED instead?  Without
understanding what audit is trying to do, that would be a lot more logical.  Or
maybe there is a reason this is correct, it just needs an explanation.

>  		spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
>  		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
>  		if (new)
> @@ -423,7 +411,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&old_entry->group->mark_mutex);
>  	spin_lock(&old_entry->lock);
> -	if (!old_entry->connector) {
> +	if (!old_entry->connector || !old_entry->connector->inode) {
>  		/* old_entry is being shot, lets just lie */
>  		spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
>  		mutex_unlock(&old_entry->group->mark_mutex);
> -- 
> 2.10.2
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux