Hi Thomas, John, I've been writing a testcase for xfstests to test statx. However, it's turned up what I think is a bug in the kernel's time-tracking system. If I do: date +%s.%N touch foo dump-timestamps foo such that foo is created, sometimes the atime, mtime and ctime timestamps on foo will be *before* the time printed by 'date'. For example: [root@andromeda ~]# Z=/b/zebra6; date +%s.%N; touch $Z; /tmp/dump-timestamps $Z 1490894656.267225764 st_atime: 1490894656.267032686 st_mtime: 1490894656.267032686 st_ctime: 1490894656.267032686 As can be seen, the three file timestamps are -193078 nsec from the prior clock time. This was with git commit: 89970a04d70c6c9e5e4492fd4096c0b5630a478c the current head of Linus's tree. I'm sure I've seen a case where tv_sec differed by 1 when running my xfstests script, but it's hard to reproduce that. It also occurs with other file types, not just regular files. It occurs on both ext4 and xfs. I've attached the source for dump-timestamps below. David --- #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/stat.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct stat st; if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Format: %s <file>\n", argv[0]); exit(2); } if (stat(argv[1], &st) == -1) { perror(argv[1]); exit(1); } printf("st_atime: %ld.%09ld\n", st.st_atim.tv_sec, st.st_atim.tv_nsec); printf("st_mtime: %ld.%09ld\n", st.st_mtim.tv_sec, st.st_mtim.tv_nsec); printf("st_ctime: %ld.%09ld\n", st.st_ctim.tv_sec, st.st_ctim.tv_nsec); return 0; }