Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: changes to statx interface [ver #2]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Running "compare" tests like this is not a function that xfs_io
> should perform. Have it run and output the statx information,
> and use xfstests to compare that against a golden output and/or
> the output of the xfs_io stat command.

A golden output that covers timestamps isn't possible.

Also comparing the output of Eric's statx command with the output of the stat
command as it stands isn't practical.  I guess I can add another parameter to
the stat command to produce something that looks the same.

I'm tempted to write C-based python3 module that gives raw access to the
system calls (something I want for the unionmount testsuite) and then script
this in python.

David



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux