Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: changes to statx interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:04 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > Further, this should work:
>> >
>> >         warthog>xfs_io -c "statx -c" /dev/sda
>> >         /dev/sda: Permission denied
>> >
>>
>> This opens /dev/sda for read/write and feeds the fd to the commands
>> executed.
>> You may want to try
>> xfs_io -r -c "statx -c" /dev/sda
>
> I've added -P to open to supply O_PATH, but I'm having trouble testing the
> dirfd usage - I think probably because file->name is an absolute path:
>
>         xfs_io> open /dev
>         Opened 0
>         xfs_io> open sda
>         sda: No such file or directory
>         xfs_io> open /dev/sda
>         Opened 1
>
> Possibly open should be able to take a base dir and call openat().

Yeh, I told you statx -d does not make much sense for xfs_io.
I don't think you wanna go there...

>
> (I also made it print the file table index after a successful open, though I
> perhaps only want to do this in interactive mode).
>
>> By the time statx() gets to fs specific code it does not matter if you
>> called it with -d/-f or like stat() does it?
>
> No.  But all the calling options still have to be tested, as does stuffing bad
> values into the syscall args - something xfstests seems to be very poor at.
>
>> In my (hopefully unbiased) opinion, there is room for the syscall sanity
>> tests that you posted to LTP and there is room for file system
>> functional tests with xfstests, which xfs_io can be used for.
>
> Yes.  I agree.  Christoph may be of the opinion that LTP is a trainwreck, but
> it can do some things much more easily than can xfstests, primarily because
> its tests are written in C.
>

Adding C tests under src/ dir is a viable option.

> Any suggestions on how to do timestamp comparisons?  I really want to be able
> to do things like asking if mtime > btime or btime < wall clock time.  I guess
> I could add another command for that.

Not in xfs_io, don't go there.

You can look at tests/generic/003 (it hurts the eyes a bit)
Perhaps it would be better to write a small C helper (e.g.
t_compare_statx_times)
and then tests could be easily and flexibly extended.

Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux