Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] VFS permit cross device vfs_copy_file_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:38:03AM -0500, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > On Mar 2, 2017, at 11:07 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > NAK, we really should not do operations between different
> > superblocks.
> 
> Can you provide some reasoning as to why? What would it break? The
> reasoning for including one is to allow for a file system to achieve
> better performance which seems like a feature that would be of great
> benefit. --

Yes, this has come up a few times.  What's going on?:

	- There was an explanation, and I missed it.
	- The explanation is complicated and Christoph hasn't had time
	  to write it up.
	- Christoph has a strong suspicion there are issues without
	  being sure exactly where they are.
	- Something else?

I mean, the whole enterprise is dead in the water without this, as far
as I can tell, so I'd really like to understand the answer one way or
the other.

--b.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux