On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 11:16:01AM -0500, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I guess I'm just hung up on the EINVAL vs. short copy behavior. It > seems more annoying and error-prone to be prepared for both, as opposed > to trying clone and then explicitly falling back to copy if that doesn't > work. Maybe it's not that big a deal. We can do short copies^H^H^H^H^Hclones for clone just as easily, at least for local filesystems (NFS would require some tweaks due to the protocol).
