Re: [RFC v1 01/19] fs: Don't copy beyond the end of the file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 11:16:01AM -0500, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I guess I'm just hung up on the EINVAL vs. short copy behavior.  It
> seems more annoying and error-prone to be prepared for both, as opposed
> to trying clone and then explicitly falling back to copy if that doesn't
> work.  Maybe it's not that big a deal.

We can do short copies^H^H^H^H^Hclones for clone just as easily,
at least for local filesystems (NFS would require some tweaks due to the
protocol).



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux