On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode > data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync > since > another task could still have it open for write. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/truncate.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c > index 6263affdef88..29ae420a5bf9 100644 > --- a/mm/truncate.c > +++ b/mm/truncate.c > @@ -594,11 +594,15 @@ invalidate_complete_page2(struct address_space > *mapping, struct page *page) > > static int do_launder_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct > page *page) > { > + int ret; > + > if (!PageDirty(page)) > return 0; > if (page->mapping != mapping || mapping->a_ops->launder_page > == NULL) > return 0; > - return mapping->a_ops->launder_page(page); > + ret = mapping->a_ops->launder_page(page); > + mapping_set_error(mapping, ret); > + return ret; > } > > /** No. At that layer, you don't know that this is a page error. In the NFS case, it could, for instance, just as well be a fatal signal. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx