David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not completely trivial - the ino_t -> unsigned long conversion needs to be > > propagated fairly widely in there. > > I'll just make it unsigned long. That's what iget() took as the inode number > parameter type, so it can't behave any differently as a first guess. On the other hand, __vxfs_iget() takes ino_t, so that's the right thing to do in this case. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
