On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > The grow_dev_page() pages should be reclaimable even though migration > is not supported for those pages? They were marked movable as it was > useful for lumpy reclaim taking back pages for hugepage allocations and > the like. Would it make sense for memory unremove to attempt migration > first and reclaim second? Note that a page is still movable even if there is no file system method for migration available. In that case the page needs to be cleaned before it can be moved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
