Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] On inode::i_count and the usage vs reference count issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Usage counts are common and useful, so for now they should stay as-is
and if people can came up with a useful primitive for them we can
consider implementing it.

Trying to shoe-horn everything into refcount_t is a horrible idea.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux