Re: [PATCH] vfs: hoist {XFS,EXT4}_IOC_{GOING,SHUT}DOWN to the VFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: hoist {XFS,EXT4}_IOC_{GOING,SHUT}DOWN to the VFS
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:54:47 +0800
Cc: <linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20170223075230.GB5837@birch.djwong.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0

Hi Darrick,

On 2017/2/23 15:52, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> ext4 and XFS expose the same shutdown ioctl with the same parameters,
> so let's hoist the whole mess into the vfs headers.

Could you cover f2fs in this patch since f2fs has already supported SHUTDOWN ioctl?

Thanks,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] vfs: hoist {XFS, EXT4}_IOC_{GOING, SHUT}DOWN to the VFS
  - From: Jaegeuk Kim

References:
- [PATCH] vfs: hoist {XFS,EXT4}_IOC_{GOING,SHUT}DOWN to the VFS
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fuse: fix use after free issue in fuse_dev_do_read()
Next by Date: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: avoid out-of-order execution of atomic writes
Previous by thread: [PATCH] vfs: hoist {XFS,EXT4}_IOC_{GOING,SHUT}DOWN to the VFS
Next by thread: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] vfs: hoist {XFS, EXT4}_IOC_{GOING, SHUT}DOWN to the VFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux