Yes, exactly, I just mean it for short with word "clean up", thanks for correction. On 2017/2/23 8:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 02/22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >> Hi Yunlong, >> >> This is NOT clean-up. What's your point here? > I guess you wanted to do like this. > > >From 8d344ac45890dd95c5734fd29a19a7c19364c327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:50:49 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: do SSR for data when there is enough free space > > In allocate_segment_by_default(), need_SSR() already detected it's time to do > SSR. So, let's try to find victims for data segments more aggressively in time. > > Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index d01ee7b94702..c27dab43c42f 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -1541,7 +1541,7 @@ static int get_ssr_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type) > struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type); > const struct victim_selection *v_ops = DIRTY_I(sbi)->v_ops; > > - if (IS_NODESEG(type) || !has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0)) > + if (IS_NODESEG(type)) > return v_ops->get_victim(sbi, > &(curseg)->next_segno, BG_GC, type, SSR); > -- Thanks, Yunlong Song
