Hi Yunlong, I already started to test this since a couple of days ago. :) http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev-test&id=908b5f463c82eaf972b149a26bb310f5e25064fd Thanks, On 02/17, Yunlong Song wrote: > If the free segments are used up, then new_curseg will fail for > CURSEG_WARM_NODE, in this case, we should use change_curseg instead of > new_curseg. > > Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index df2ff5c..32820cd 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -1564,8 +1564,6 @@ static void allocate_segment_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > if (force) > new_curseg(sbi, type, true); > - else if (type == CURSEG_WARM_NODE) > - new_curseg(sbi, type, false); > else if (curseg->alloc_type == LFS && is_next_segment_free(sbi, type)) > new_curseg(sbi, type, false); > else if (need_SSR(sbi) && get_ssr_segment(sbi, type)) > -- > 1.8.5.2
