Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:56:31 -0500
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <2947c1ee-f3a5-d6f0-aee4-9cbe33df0472@oracle.com>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:21:17PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> 
>  IMO not all data center solutions would need file-name encryption,
>  its better to bring back the option to disable the file-name
>  encryption.

Why, because you trust the HDD firmware[1]?

[1] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/17/kaspersky_labs_equation_group/

					- Ted

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
  - From: Anand Jain

References:
- fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
  - From: Anand Jain
- Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
  - From: Richard Weinberger
- Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
  - From: Anand Jain

Prev by Date: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] slab reclaim
Next by Date: Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
Previous by thread: Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
Next by thread: Re: fs/crypto: file-name encryption, optional ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux