Re: setattr ATTR_SIZE vs the rest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I've got a report that there NFS clients that send SETATTR requests that
> mix size changes with uid/gid changes

That sounds a little weird.  Do you know anything about which clients,
or how common the behavior is?

> (see the recent pynfs patch for an
> artifical reproducer).  At least XFS and GFS2 are very unhappy with this,
> and other file systems also don't seem to handle the case correctly.

Does this cause a crash or corruption, or "just" fail to set the
attributes correctly?  (Just wondering how urgent the fix is....).

--b.

> 
> This patch splits the truncate processing in NFS out into a separate
> ->setattr call and uses the vfs_truncate helper for it, which also happens
> to shrink the NFSD code size by reusing more VFS boiler plate code.
> 
> I suspect in the mid-term we really should add a ->truncate method (different
> from the previous callback of the same name) to separate the two concepts
> clearly at the VFS level.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux