"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> - Whenever you mount a filesystem with DAX, it spits out a message that says >> "DAX enabled. Warning: EXPERIMENTAL, use at your own risk". What criteria >> needs to be met for DAX to no longer be considered experimental? > > For XFS I'd like to get reflink working with it, for starters. What do you mean by this, exactly? When Dave outlined the requirements for PMEM_IMMUTABLE, it was very clear that metadata updates would not be possible. And would you really cosider this a barrier to marking dax fully supported? I wouldn't. > We probably need a bunch more verification work to show that file IO > doesn't adopt any bad quirks having turned on the per-inode DAX flag. Can you be more specific? We have ltp and xfstests. If you have some mkfs/mount options that you think should be tested, speak up. Beyond that, if it passes ./check -g auto and ltp, are we good? -Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
