Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 06:29:52AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 06:30:05PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> > Eric W. Biederman (3): >> > mnt: Protect the mountpoint hashtable with mount_lock >> ACK >> >> > mnt: Tuck mounts under others instead of creating shadow/side mounts. >> >> NAK; you have reintroduced put_mountpoint() outside of mount lock in there >> and you've got seriously confused umount side of the things. > > PS: details are in my reply (admittedly, sent only ~20 minutes > before your pull request) to your patch. Check Message-ID > <20170107050644.GA12074@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I suspect that was sent while I was composing my pull request, and the locking around put_mountpoint I did fail to catch during my rebase. I will finish our conversation about that before I resend that patch. > My apologies for not getting to it yesterday (the patch was posted a couple of > days ago, AFAICS) - I'd been off-net since Wednesday, just got back > ;-/ You and Ram Pai had said reasonably pleasant things about a previous version of that patch. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
