[PATCH] f2fs: fix small discards when se->valid_blocks is zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In the small discard case, when se->valid_blocks is zero, the add_discard_addrs
will directly return without __add_discard_entry. This will cause the file
delete have no small discard. The case is like this:

1. Allocate free 2M segment
2. Write a file (size n blocks < 512) in that 2M segment, se->valid_blocks = n
3. Delete that file, se->valid_blocks = 0, add_discard_addrs will return without
sending any discard of that file, and forever due to cur_map[i] ^ ckpt_map[i] =
0 after that checkpoint

Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 0738f48..8610f14 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static void add_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
 		return;
 
 	if (!force) {
-		if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) || !se->valid_blocks ||
+		if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) ||
 		    SM_I(sbi)->nr_discards >= SM_I(sbi)->max_discards)
 			return;
 	}
-- 
1.8.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux