On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:51:36PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > The only significant thing I see is that you have not taken the > mount_lock on the path where new_mountpoint adds the new struct > mountpoint into the mountpoint hash table. Umm... Point, but I really don't like that bouncing mount_lock up and down there. It's not going to cause any serious overhead, but it just looks ugly... ;-/ Let me think for a while... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
