On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:14:28PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > Hmm, it still seems weird to define fscrypt_zeroout_range() when it can't > actually be used. It looks like the problem is specifically the use of > alloc_bounce_page() and do_page_crypto(). Would it be that bad to make those > available in fscrypt_internal.h (not exported to filesystems)? Sounds good to me. > Also, it seems the actual problem is that fscrypt_zeroout_range() tries to be > clever and reuse one bounce page over and over. But this seems very inefficient > because it has to wait for each block to be synchronously written out before > moving on to the next. I'm thinking it really should be updated to work more > like the normal write path, and then it could use fscrypt_encrypt_page()... That sounds even better, but might take a little more time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
