On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 05:51:11PM -0900, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 09:19:57PM +0000, Josef Bacik wrote: > > Eeesh these are older than I thought, I pushed to > > https://github.com/josefbacik/fstests.git. The fsx work is there and is > > generic, the fsstress one has some btrfs specific stuff but you can just pull > > that crap out and it'll work on anything. Let me know if you need anything > > else, thanks, > > Thanks > > I got your first fsx based test up and running, but - did you get it to pass > with any existing filesystems? > > I finally figured out what I'm seeing, in _check_files() where it's looping over > the mark: I changed it to so that it always checks the fsync marks in the order > where it was created, but when it goes to check the very first mark it's getting > the very last version of the file (at least, the file size is consistent with > that). > > I just pushed what I'm working off of, but I don't think it's anything I > broke... > > https://evilpiepirate.org/git/xfstests.git Just figured it out - log replay doesn't touch anything that hadn't been written at that point in the log, so the newer journal entries were still there. fun... If I blow away the journal before replay, it works. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
