On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:42:14PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> I'm able to consistently hit the following XFS assertion with v4.9-rc8 and
>> xfstest xfs/118 (log is passed through kasan_symbolize.py):
>
> commit 4dfce57db635 ("xfs: fix up xfs_swap_extent_forks inline
> extent handling") in the XFS for-next tree.
>
> Ross - when you get a failure in a brand new test in xfstests
> (xfs/118 was merged about a month ago), it's worth checking whether
> the problem is already fixed in the XFS for-next tree. In general,
> the regression tests exercising such bugs aren't merged until the
> fix has been committed...
Ah, thanks Dave. This make sense, and I'll be sure to do this from now on.
- Ross
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
