Re: [PATCH] fuse.4: Add new file describing /dev/fuse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/11/2016 08:55 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Dec 11 2016, "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 12/11/2016 04:31 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>> On Dec 11 2016, "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/2016 10:13 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 10 2016, Keno Fischer <keno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> This is my writeup of a basic description of /dev/fuse after playing with
>>>>>> it for a few hours today. It is of course woefully incomplete, and since
>>>>>> I neither have a use case nor am working on this code, I will not be
>>>>>> in a position to expand it in the near future. However, I'm hoping this
>>>>>> could still serve as a handy reference for others looking at this interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's great! It makes me wonder:
>>>>>
>>>>> At the moment, libfuse ships a mount.fuse(8) manpage that documents both
>>>>> the mount options that can be passed to the kernel, and the pseudo-mount
>>>>> options that can be used when using libfuse (but that are actually
>>>>> implemented in userspace).
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it make sense to remove everything kernel related from
>>>>> mount.fuse(8) and move it into linux-manpages?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the manpage I'm talking about:
>>>>> https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/blob/master/doc/mount.fuse.8
>>>>
>>>> I can see pros and cons. mount(8) does a similar thing
>>>> for mount options understood by the kernel. So there is precedent
>>>> for the approach taken in mount.fuse.8
>>>
>>> The difference is that all the options in mount(8) are meant to be used
>>> by the user calling mount, while a good fraction of the (kernel) mount
>>> options for FUSE filesystems are not meant to be passed by the user but
>>> must be generated by the filesystem internally.
>>
>> Okay -- that's a significant difference. So, I see the logic of
>> the proposal...
> 
> In that case, what do you think would be the best place? Add a new
> manpage? Add them to mount(8)? Or to fuse(4)?

I wonder about possibly a fuse(7) page?

Cheers,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux