On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> @@ -1739,8 +1739,6 @@ static int fuse_setattr(struct dentry *e
>> * This should be done on write(), truncate() and chown().
>> */
>> if (!fc->handle_killpriv) {
>
> One more thing too. I don't think we really want to monkey with the mode
> at all if there is a request to set the mode already in the request. So
> maybe this should be:
>
> if (!fc->handle_killpriv && !(attr->ia_mode & ATTR_MODE))
>
> Granted that won't generally happen from normal process context, but we
> could have knfsd in here too and I think that's possible from there.
Apparently this can't happen even from knfsd; notify_change() has this comment:
/*
* We now pass ATTR_KILL_S*ID to the lower level setattr function so
* that the function has the ability to reinterpret a mode change
* that's due to these bits. This adds an implicit restriction that
* no function will ever call notify_change with both ATTR_MODE and
* ATTR_KILL_S*ID set.
*/
if ((ia_valid & (ATTR_KILL_SUID|ATTR_KILL_SGID)) &&
(ia_valid & ATTR_MODE))
BUG();
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
