Re: Remaining work needed for moving Lustre out of staging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:53:08PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> Al,
> Greg recently raised the issue of what still needs to be done to
> move the Lustre code out of staging/ and into the fs/ tree. 
> 
> James has been doing a great job of cleaning up various checkpatch
> issues and keeping the code updated with the latest fixes, but we
> were wondering what you were aware of that needed to be cleaned
> up in Lustre?

Is the whole "mixing kernel structures in userspace structures" all
resolved now?  For some reason I thought that you had kernel locks being
passed to userspace and then back into the kernel, but it's been a long
time since I last looked...

If you feel you are ready for a "real" review, I'll be glad to go over
the code before the vfs people look at it, just let me know.  No need to
bother them if you still have basic things wrong that I can find...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux