From: Konstantin Khlebnikov [mailto:koct9i@xxxxxxxxx] > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Matthew Wilcox > <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This rather complicated function can be better implemented as an iterator. > > It has only one caller, so move the functionality to the only place that > > needs it. Update the test suite to follow the same pattern. > > Looks good. I suppose this patch could be applied separately. Yes, a number of these patches stand alone from each other and could easily be separated out. I'm going to put your Reviewed-by: on the patches you've said "Looks good" to. Thanks! ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
