From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> We drop the lock which protects the radix tree, so we must call radix_tree_iter_next() in order to avoid a modification to the tree invalidating the iterator state. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c index bf62ad9..73076a0 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ void btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); continue; } + slot = radix_tree_iter_next(&iter); spin_unlock(&fs_info->buffer_lock); free_extent_buffer_stale(eb); spin_lock(&fs_info->buffer_lock); -- 2.10.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
