[RFC][PATCH 0/2] fsnotify: reduce coupling of permission and non permission events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The issue reported by Miklos Szeredi was processes blocking when trying
to close an inotify file descriptor, while another fanotify listener is
failing to handle permission events.

Miklos included a test program with the report.
His test program with some modifications is available on my github:
https://github.com/amir73il/fsnotify-utils/blob/master/fanotify_bug.c

Ideally, we would want that destruction of a group would only block
if an event handled by this group is in progress, but this is not easy
to achieve. Instead, we make sure that destrurction of a group would
only block if an event handled by a group of similar class (priority)
is in progress.

Amir Goldstein (2):
  fsnotify: separate fsnotify_mark_srcu for groups with permission
    events
  fsnotify: handle permission events without holding
    fsnotify_mark_srcu[0]

 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 15 ++++++---
 fs/notify/fsnotify.c          | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 fs/notify/fsnotify.h          | 17 ++++++++--
 fs/notify/group.c             |  2 +-
 fs/notify/mark.c              | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 5 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux