Re: [RFC][PATH 4/4] ovl: relax lock_rename when moving files between work and upper dir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:11:16AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:

> That is explained in commit message of the first 2 patches, but
> foremost I would like to say that the name "delete locked" is just the
> best of all the bad choices for names I came up with, so I am expecting
> better name suggestions.
> 
> The concept is to pin the entry so that it cannot be moved, so can have
> certain guaranties about the stability of the directories topology.
> 
> > More specifically, what makes you think that may_delete() is called before
> > any change of parent?
> 
> Because it is checked at the beginning of vfs_rename()
> and in order to change a parent, an entry needs to be renamed. no?
> What am I missing?

Analysis of the rest of call chains where we have __d_move() called?  Not
to mention anything else, workdir itself might be moved around by
d_splice_alias() for a sufficiently unpleasant filesystem...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux