Richacl and ext4 vs. xfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas,
I had been working on getting some VMs together to experiment with a
few different Richacl configurations and it looks like the e2fsprogs
git hub repo with richacl enhanced ext4 utilities may need to be
updated or have an incompatibility with current kernels (See e2fsprogs
github link at http://www.bestbits.at/richacl/ ).  XFS worked ok.

Fedora 24 Workstation, created two extra disks
/dev/sdb for xfs
/dev/sdc for ext4

Built and installed Andreas's 4.9.0-rc1 based kernel richacl branch
and the other repos (xfsprogs, richacl etc.).    Had no problem
formatting and using /dev/sdb1 as xfs, but once I installed e2fsprogs
from Andreas's tree I couldn't boot the system (removed e2fsprogs and
the ext4 partition and booted fine).  With Andreas's e2fsprogs I
couldn't boot 4.9.0-rc1


-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux