On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:03:53AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 12:09:03AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > I plan to grab Ross's PMD series in the next couple of days and I'll > > > > push it out as a stable topic branch once I've sanity tested it. I > > > > don't really want to take a big chunk of ext4 stuff through the XFS > > > > tree if it can be avoided.... > > > > > > Yea, we also need to figure out how to get Jan's "dax: Clear dirty bits after > > > flushing caches" set merged, which is mostly MM stuff and I think will go > > > through akpm's tree? That set is also based on my PMD stuff. > > > > Yeah, I've spoken to Andrew and he wants to take the MM changes through his > > tree. I'll talk to him how to make this happen given the patches the series > > depends on but the series still needs some review so "how to merge" is not > > exactly a question of the day... > > I assume there isn't a convenient git tree I can pull for the purposes > of testing Jan's patch series and for the purposes of seeing how > everything fits together? I think Jan posted a test branch with all the current stuff under review in it here: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git dax > In other words, as far as I understand > things there currently isn't an unstable topic branch I can pull for > the purposes of review and testing, but hopefully Dave will make a > stable topic branch in a few days. Is that right? I've got the dax-pmd topic branch running regression tests right now. I'm hoping that all goes well and if it does I'll get it out by the end of the day. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
