We don't need to hold a d_lock / d_seq locks while d_unhashed checking.
Lets do these locks less hot.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Lyashkov <alexey.lyashkov@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dcache.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 0863841..c23effb 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -1327,12 +1327,8 @@ int d_set_mounted(struct dentry *dentry)
write_seqlock(&rename_lock);
for (p = dentry->d_parent; !IS_ROOT(p); p = p->d_parent) {
/* Need exclusion wrt. d_invalidate() */
- spin_lock(&p->d_lock);
- if (unlikely(d_unhashed(p))) {
- spin_unlock(&p->d_lock);
+ if (unlikely(d_unhashed(p)))
goto out;
- }
- spin_unlock(&p->d_lock);
}
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (!d_unlinked(dentry)) {
@@ -1510,12 +1506,8 @@ void d_invalidate(struct dentry *dentry)
/*
* If it's already been dropped, return OK.
*/
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
- if (d_unhashed(dentry)) {
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ if (d_unhashed(dentry))
return;
- }
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
/* Negative dentries can be dropped without further checks */
if (!dentry->d_inode) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
