Re: [PATCH 11/20] mm: Remove unnecessary vma->vm_ops check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 06:08:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> We don't check whether vma->vm_ops is NULL in do_shared_fault() so
> there's hardly any point in checking it in wp_page_shared() which gets
> called only for shared file mappings as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index a4522e8999b2..63d9c1a54caf 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2301,7 +2301,7 @@ static int wp_page_shared(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *old_page)
>  
>  	get_page(old_page);
>  
> -	if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->page_mkwrite) {
> +	if (vma->vm_ops->page_mkwrite) {
>  		int tmp;
>  
>  		pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
> -- 
> 2.6.6

Does this apply equally to the check in wp_pfn_shared()?  Both
wp_page_shared() and wp_pfn_shared() are called for shared file mappings via
do_wp_page().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux