On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:23 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> fcntl(0, F_SETOWN, 0x80000000) triggers:
> UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/fcntl.c:118:7
> negation of -2147483648 cannot be represented in type 'int':
> CPU: 1 PID: 18261 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.8.1-0-syzkaller #1
> ...
> Call Trace:
> ...
> [<ffffffffad8f0868>] ? f_setown+0x1d8/0x200
> [<ffffffffad8f19a9>] ? SyS_fcntl+0x999/0xf30
> [<ffffffffaed1fb00>] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1
>
> Fix that by checking the arg parameter properly (against INT_MAX) and
> return immediatelly in case it is wrong. No error is returned, the
> same as in other cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> fs/fcntl.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
> index 350a2c8cfd28..bfc3b040d956 100644
> --- a/fs/fcntl.c
> +++ b/fs/fcntl.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ void f_setown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg, int force)
> enum pid_type type;
> struct pid *pid;
> int who = arg;
> +
> + if (arg > INT_MAX)
> + return;
> +
> type = PIDTYPE_PID;
> if (who < 0) {
> type = PIDTYPE_PGID;
Might it be better to change f_setown to return int there, so you can
return -EINVAL in that case? The other caller (sock_ioctl) can also
handle an int return there too...
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
