On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 05:40:31PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 15-09-16 14:54:53, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > We want page to be isolated from the rest of the system before spliting
> > it. We rely on page count to be 2 for file pages to make sure nobody
> > uses the page: one pin to caller, one to radix-tree.
> >
> > Filesystems with backing storage can have page count increased if it has
> > buffers.
> >
> > Let's try to free them, before attempt split. And remove one guarding
> > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ...
> > @@ -2041,6 +2041,23 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Try to free buffers before attempt split */
> > + if (!PageSwapBacked(head) && PagePrivate(page)) {
> > + /*
> > + * We cannot trigger writeback from here due possible
> > + * recursion if triggered from vmscan, only wait.
> > + *
> > + * Caller can trigger writeback it on its own, if safe.
> > + */
> > + wait_on_page_writeback(head);
> > +
> > + if (page_has_buffers(head) &&
> > + !try_to_free_buffers(head)) {
> > + ret = -EBUSY;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
>
> Shouldn't you rather use try_to_release_page() here? Because filesystems
> have their ->releasepage() callbacks for freeing data associated with a
> page. It is not guaranteed page private data are buffers although it is
> true for ext4...
Fair enough. Will fix this.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
