I don't really like the eof_scan_owner magic, but that's just copying the existing eofblock scan code, so I guess I shouldn't complain here. Besides that and what appears to generally be a lot of duplication of the eofblock scanning code this looks fine: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
