> + * For a remap operation, just "allocate" an extent at the address that the
> + * caller passed in, and ensure that the AGFL is the right size. The caller
> + * will then map the "allocated" extent into the file somewhere.
> + */
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_bmap_remap_alloc(
> + struct xfs_bmalloca *ap)
> +{
> + struct xfs_trans *tp = ap->tp;
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
> + xfs_agblock_t bno;
> + struct xfs_alloc_arg args;
> + int error;
> +
> + /*
> + * validate that the block number is legal - the enables us to detect
> + * and handle a silent filesystem corruption rather than crashing.
> + */
> + memset(&args, 0, sizeof(struct xfs_alloc_arg));
> + args.tp = ap->tp;
> + args.mp = ap->tp->t_mountp;
> + bno = *ap->firstblock;
> + args.agno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(mp, bno);
> + ASSERT(args.agno < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount);
> + args.agbno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGBNO(mp, bno);
> + ASSERT(args.agbno < mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks);
Shouldn't this return -EFSCORRUPED instead? Otherwise the comment
above isn't really true.
Otherwise this looks fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
