On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Michael Theall <mtheall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm currently trying to port my code to take advantage of this. I've > found myself in sort of a catch-22 situation: I don't know whether to > pass default_permissions or not. > > Right now, I support ACLs by not using default_permissions. However, > the FUSE_POSIX_ACL capability is only given when default_permissions is > turned on. If I unconditionally set FUSE_POSIX_ACL in the "want" flags, > the capability remains disabled if default_permissions is off. > > I need to support ACLs on backlevel platforms with default_permissions > off, and the coming platforms with default_permissions on. How do you > suggest I determine whether to provide it or not? Good point. FUSE_POSIX_ACL needs to be made independent of (but implying) default_permissions. Force pushed to fuse.git#for-next with other minor changes. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
