Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Writing a small test module to exercise slub/slab in various ways
> (allocating from all cpus freeing from one, as described) should not be
> too hard. Perhaps that would be enough to find this performance
> discrepancy between slab and slub?

You could simulate that by just sending packets using unix sockets 
between threads bound to different CPUs. Sending a packet allocates; receiving 
deallocates.

But it's not clear that will really simulate the cache bounce environment
of the database test. I don't think all passing of data between CPUs 
using slub objects is slow.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux