On Sun, 2016-09-11 at 15:04 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Logfs was introduced to the kernel in 2009, and hasn't seen any non > drive-by changes since 2012, while having lots of unsolved issues > including the complete lack of error handling, with more and more > issues popping up without any fixes. > > The logfs.org domain has been bouncing from a mail, and the > maintainer > on the non-logfs.org domain hasn't repsonded to past queries either. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Back in 2008 logfs and UBIFS were in sort of competing projects. I remember we inspected logfs code and tested it - we did not find proper wear-levelling and bad block handling, we did not see proper error handling, and it exploded when we were running relatively simple tests. We indicated this here in a very humble way to avoid the "conflict of interest" perseption: https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/31/117 I did not follow logfs since then, but I think there wasn't much development since then and all these issue are still there. I mean, unless I am horribly mistaken, logfs does not really have the basic features of a flash file system and there is no point keeping it in the tree and consuming people's time maintaining it. Artem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
