Re: [PATCH] ovl: use copy_file_range for copy up if possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 09:52:21AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > vfs_copy_file_range() implementation because ovl_copy_up_data()
> > splices in small chunks allowing the user to kill the copying process.
> > This makes sense because the poor process only called open(),
> > so the app writer may not have been expecting a stall of copying
> > a large file...
> 
> So call vfs_copy_file_range() iteratively, just like is being done
> right now for do_splice_direct() to limit latency on kill.

I wish vfs_copy_file_range would do useful chinking itself.

But either way it might be a good idea to call vfs_clone_file_range
first, because that gives your a very efficient copy without the need
to copy anything if supported.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux