On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > >> Said that, I'm not sure why mount_pseudo() would be returning any errors; >> rejection should happen in the caller (due to MS_NOUSER in the flags), but >> I don't understand what would trigger it on mount_pseudo() level... > > I see what's going on, but I wonder if sget() is the right place for userns > checks... FWIW, the upstream patch fixes the crash for me. Do I understand it correctly that there is no perfect branch for such testing (testing that aims at catching regressions asap and not reporting what's already fixed)? Both mainline and linux-next miss some fixes and functionality that is present on the other branch, right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
