* Christoph Hellwig: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:28:20PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: >> That was my original thinking, but several people seemed to think that >> we should just go ahead and support it. TBH, I don't much care either >> way, but we either need to support it properly, or ensure that trying >> to use OFD locks in a non-LFS program fails to compile. > > Yes, that's what glibc folks should do for now given that they still > seem to refuse being draggred into the present. Your assumptions are wrong, at least for some (many?) of us. 32-bit architectures are legacy; giving them a 64-bit off_t (or even time_t) does not really change that. A hard ABI transition is simply not worth the effort. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
